Newer blog post
more in Blog
Older blog post
Newer blog post by Mrs. Corn
more by Mrs. Corn (oldest)
Older blog post by Mrs. Corn
Mrs. Corn's Picture
Mrs. Corn, Newport, RI Age and Occupation in '07: 31, HR for public accounting firm Fiance's Age and Occupation: 33, Consultant for public accounting firm Engagement Date: October 7, 2006 Wedding Date: September, 2007 Blogging Since: June 1, 2007 Venue: North Lawn of Fort Adams State Park About Me: I am a lazy scrapbooker who loves the instant gratification of making cards and I am very easily distracted by all things shiny. In honor of my childhood nights spent hibachi BBQing on the beach with my family, we are hosting a traditional New England Clambake for our reception.
About Mrs. Corn

Ok… I Need Your Help Again

July 29th, 2007 @ 5:31 pm by Mrs. Corn

We worked on our wedding programs this weekend. I am almost ready to start printing them, but we have one minor glitch.

Ok... I Need Your Help Again :  wedding newport programs Cornprogram1.jpg
Program 1

Can you see it? (Don’t worry, I didn’t think there was an issue either)

My newphew will be 2 1/2 years old at the time of the wedding. We wanted to include him in the service, but we also recognize that he is too young to expect him to make it down the aisle unaccompanied; especially since he is a little hesitant to do new things.

So we have asked him to escort my mom down the aisle. He and my mom have been practicing for their role for a couple of months now.

When I showed Mr. Corn the program, his only comment was that we have notated that Will is the Mother of the Bride’s Escort, but we haven’t notated that his dad, Guy, will be escorting his mom down the aisle.

My reasoning for not even THINKING that we needed to include this was because you normally wouldn’t include that information in a program and the only reason we are including it at all is because that is Will’s specific role in the wedding. My concern is that if we put who his mom’s escort is, than we will 1) make our guests think we have flipped a lid by including this information in the program 2) have Guy B listed in three different places on the program and 3) possibly run out of space on the page.

What do you all think?

Here’s what it would look like if we add it in: 

Ok... I Need Your Help Again :  wedding newport programs Cornprogram11.jpg
Program 2

Here’s what it looks like if we separate it out by person instead of role in the wedding (to keep Guy from having his name up there three times):

Ok... I Need Your Help Again :  wedding newport programs Cornprogram2.jpg
Program 3

And this is the same thing, just with the font for the names and titles switched:

Ok... I Need Your Help Again :  wedding newport programs Cornprogram3.jpg
Program 4

Should we …

…Keep it the way it is?
…Not have either in the program?
…Have both in the program?

Tags: newport, programs |
advertisement below
Newer blog post
more in Blog
Older blog post
Newer blog post by Mrs. Corn
more by Mrs. Corn (oldest)
Older blog post by Mrs. Corn

17 Responses to “Ok… I Need Your Help Again”

1.
Guest Icon
Guest
kate

I actually think you should either go with just the person’s relationship or their role in the wedding. It’s just a little too crowded with all that information. I would also definitely just list people once, even if they have multiple roles.

Also, do you need the musicians? I could see that being on there if you’re friends with them but otherwise it’s unnecessary.

 
2.
Guest Icon
Guest
Julie

I would do the version with the names in script, that does not say how they know you. As in friend of the bride ext. I would leave it at bridesmaids and who they are. For the young boy escorting your mother I would put maybe ring bearer escorted by mother of the bride so and so or the other way around.

 
3.
Guest Icon
Guest
Sara

I agree with Kate on the musicians and general information overload as well as with Julie on the names being in script. It is not necessary to “Escort of Mother of the Groom” when she is being escorted by her husband.
It’s so sweet of you to include your nephew in the wedding party even if he’s not a ring bearer or groomsman!

 
4.
Guest Icon
Guest
Karianne

What if you keep it how it was, but instead of having a separate section for “Escort”, just include that information under the “Mother of the bride/groom” section…

Mrs. so-and-so
Mother of the Bride
(Escorted by Mr. so-and-so)

the little guy is too young to be offended…

 
5.
Guest Icon
Guest
kathy

If you list the infomation on your nephew shouldn’t he be Master Will since he is uncer 16?

 
6.
Guest Icon
Guest
gji7

I think listing the mother of the brides escort only is alright - and people will understand because he will clearly not be your father and it will be cute as hell and everyone will want to know who he is.

 
7.
Guest Icon
Guest
CS

I agree with everyone else! Leave it!

 
8.
Guest Icon
Guest
kaitlin

Leave it as it is. Once people see the little guy, they’ll understand why he’s listed and why the one for his mom isn’t. We all know kids, and want to showcase them, of course!

 
9.
Guest Icon
Guest
Kristen

I like #4, but I don’t think you need to list ‘mother of the groom’s escort.’ When they see them walking down the aisle, the guests will understand.

 
10.
Guest Icon
Guest
Stephanielee

I like the reverse of fonts, as in Program #3. I think there is more emphasis on the person than their title.

 
11.
Guest Icon
Guest
Elizabeth

I think you should leave it just how it is. It’s cute that you are involving and reconizing your nephew in that way! Also, it’s a bit crowded and redundent to have your FIL’s name 3 times. If you decide to change it though, I would go with program 3, with his titles/duties listed below his name. Good Luck!

 
12.
Guest Icon
Guest
Amy

Leave it how it is. Only wedding planning crazy brides -and i guess grooms- think about these things. (Which is me too by the way:). I just think the program looks “cleaner” the first way.

 
13.
Guest Icon
Guest
Melanie

Here’s a nit for all the English majors out there: I might rephrase “Mother of the Bride’s Escort” to “Escort of the Mother of the Bride.”

As written, it sounds like your grandmother. Why? The Bride’s Escort (if following tradition) would be your father, so his mother is your grandmother. Anyway, just a thought.

 
14.
Guest Icon
Guest
Suzib215

I like number 4 - it looks cleanest to me.

 
15.
Guest Icon
Guest
Miss Corn

Melanie, THANK YOU!!! That’s what I said!!

My mom and my sister insisted on making me change it from Bride’s Mother’s Escort to Mother of the Bride’s Escort.

Turns out reason #243 for having an English Major and now full time editor as your MOH is so that she can alleviate all of the pain by explaining that if you Hyphenate Mother-of-the-Bride’s Escort, that indicates that the Mother-of-the-Bride’s part is an adjective describing the escort.

Phew.

So erase the Mother of the Bride’s Escort in your head and think of it as Mother-of-the-Bride’s Escort. Incidentally, you don’t need to hyphenate in other areas of the program…i.e. Mother of the Bride, Father of the Groom all remain unhyphenated.

With that said, thank you all for your feedback. There is no way in double hockeysticks I am going to take out the Mother-of-the-Bride’s escort since it is the specific role that my nephew has in the wedding. As my sister, our minister, points out…the only reason you list people in the program is so that people know who everyone is. You only need to list them once, because once they see that the person standing next to the groom is his dad, Guy, they don’t need to learn that the same person is the Mother-of-the-Groom’s escort, etc.

Ok…all that to say, I am sticking with option one and adding the hyphens and calling it a day.

Thanks everyone for all of your input.

 
16.
Guest Icon
Guest
Kelly

Not sure if it’s too late, perhaps you should decide to either center all the names (within each column) or left-justify all the names within each column. It looks odd to have the Titles centered and in one font and then the names not centered in another font.

 
17.
Guest Icon
Guest
Miss Corn

Thanks, Kelly. The reason they aren’t centered in these examples is because I have erased the last names of the people in the wedding party. When they are all printed, they are centered in their columns :)

 

Leave a Reply


You can also just...

Newer blog post
more in Blog
Older blog post
Newer blog post by Mrs. Corn
more by Mrs. Corn (oldest)
Older blog post by Mrs. Corn

Visit our sister sites eHarmony
Online Dating
eHarmony Advice
Dating Advice
Project Wedding
Wedding Songs
JustMommies
Pregnancy Calendar

Copyright 2004-2012, Weddingbee.com
 

Find your vendors on Weddingbee

Real reviews from brides in your area!

Favors by Weddingbee

  • Favors by season

Shop Now »

Mrs. Corn
Mrs. Corn

Mrs. Corn, Newport, RI Age and Occupation in '07: 31, HR for public accounting firm Fiance's Age and Occupation: 33, Consultant for public accounting firm Engagement Date: October 7, 2006 Wedding Date: September, 2007 Blogging Since: June 1, 2007 Venue: North Lawn of Fort Adams State Park About Me: I am a lazy scrapbooker who loves the instant gratification of making cards and I am very easily distracted by all things shiny. In honor of my childhood nights spent hibachi BBQing on the beach with my family, we are hosting a traditional New England Clambake for our reception.

Boards
Classifieds

Blog Calendar
February 2012
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
2930311234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
26272829

Weddingbee Bios
Wiki
More