

Miss GB 2.0 and I always envisioned a small, intimate wedding. Moving to another country created the “destination wedding” situation, whereby even though it was local for us, it wouldn’t be for the majority of our guests. We thought that getting married after relocating to Vancouver would be the perfect way to show our guests our new home. Of course, this also worked in favour of our small, intimate wedding vision since only people who really love you are going to go through lengths of international air travel for your big day. With a guest list somewhere around 50 (that’s our best projection at the moment), we really want each of our guests to feel like an important part of our wedding.
I guess we could always achieve that by having all 50 in the wedding. Hey, Ivana Trump and her new husband had 50 attendants!
We decided to go to the other extreme and not have any attendants. Part of this decision is completely practical. The people we’d consider as attendants live far away from us, so it’s not like we’d be enlisting them in helping us in the months leading up to the wedding. Then when they do show up for the wedding, we want them to be able to relax and enjoy their time with us.
There is also a cost saving factor in this decision. No one will be asked to buy a special outfit and in turn, we won’t need to buy extra bouquets, provide transportation, etc.
We have asked some important people in our lives to be involved in our ceremony in other ways. Our eldest niece, my grandpa, and a good friend of ours will all read passages and our other nieces and nephew will also be involved in the ceremony. The ring warming ceremony is a way that we’ll involve the rest of our guests in the wedding.
Is anyone else going the “no wedding party” route? What are your reasons?