Hot Searches:

 

 
 
 
Mrs. Lovebug Mrs. Lovebug, Tucson Age and Occupation in 06: 31, Writer Fiance's Age and Occupation: 27, Professional Game Show Contestant Engagement Date: February 18, 2007 Wedding Date: April 19, 2008 Venue: Historic Inn About Me: Likes: blogging, wikis, semi-colons, cuddling, fragrant flowers, syntax, and spooning. Dislikes: typos, dangling modifiers, flypaper, citronella candles, and run-ons. If I had my druthers, I'd exchange simple vows in a candlelit library. But I lost my druthers long ago...anyone seen them?
 
Mrs. Lovebug's Picture
Mrs. Lovebug, Tucson Age and Occupation in 06: 31, Writer Fiance's Age and Occupation: 27, Professional Game Show Contestant Engagement Date: February 18, 2007 Wedding Date: April 19, 2008 Venue: Historic Inn About Me: Likes: blogging, wikis, semi-colons, cuddling, fragrant flowers, syntax, and spooning. Dislikes: typos, dangling modifiers, flypaper, citronella candles, and run-ons. If I had my druthers, I'd exchange simple vows in a candlelit library. But I lost my druthers long ago...anyone seen them?
About Mrs. Lovebug

Sitting around waiting for our professional pictures to arrive (we get them tomorrow!), I’ve had plenty of time to get my Flickr account nice and tidy. In doing so, I’ve discovered the wonderland that is Picnik, Flickr’s photo editing tool. And oh, what a wonderland it is. If Flickr is my crack addiction, Picnik is my own personal meth lab.

Scenario 1: Say you’re like me, and you’ve got a load of crappy pictures taking up your hard drive. But they’re not so crappy that you want to dump them - maybe they’re all you’ve got from some important event, or they’re the only shots you have of that one night your girlfriend Prudence reaaaallly cut loose.

Scenario 2: You’ve been inundated with all the mediocre photos your friends and family took at your wedding. (Don’t feel bad for thinking they’re mediocre. After all, everyone takes mediocre pictures sometime.) Or you have wedding planning photos you can’t bear to part with, in spite of the fact that you have eight trillion professional pics as well.

In either scenario, it’s Picnik to the rescue! It takes the most pedestrian, boring photos, and makes them look downright professional. It’s THE BOMB. I give you Exhibit A, a crappy photo of Mr. Lovebug and I at a hookah bar last year:


Crappy lighting, crappy composition, crappy everything. Still, it’s cute enough to want to keep, right? (Sort of like all those quasi-lame table shots your guests take at the wedding.) Now, take a look at what Picnik can do with it:

One of my favorite tools in Picnik is the “Lomo-ish” option, which (obviously enough) punches up the color of the photo and gives it a vignette.

But once you’ve given your blah photo some color oomph, there’s more that can be done. Something I love about professional photography that I can never imitate is the cool focus effect. I’m just not that advanced in my photographic endeavors (yet!).

Well, Picnik can help you fake just that effect, by pulling out a feature of the photo to focus on, and blurring the rest, such as Mr. Lovebug’s face:

…or mine:

…or even the hookah pipe:

These looks are achieved by using the “Focal Soften” option, which gives you an adjustable radius to move over the photo. And you can control how blurry the blur is (these are at the blurrier end of the scale).

Another cool trick is to put your CP (crappy photo) into “Holga-ish” effect:

This does more than just convert the photo to black and white; it imitates a Holga camera by diffusing the light, blurring and darkening the edges, and bringing the focus to the middle of the photo. It’s great for those shots with an ugly or cluttered background.

You can then take this effect and add in the “Focal Soften” effect, and you’ve got:

All of a sudden, a random, blah photo looks like it was (more or less) thoughtfully composed.

Not convinced? Here are some other Cps made vastly more interesting through Picnik (post-wedding leisure time rocks!):


From a veil shopping trip (I only wore the dress as a try-on reference, since it was the same blush pink as the one I’d ordered). I “Lomo” ized it for color, then put the focus on the gorgeous folds of the dress.


Man in Chinatown, San Francisco - Again, added “Lomo-ish” and “Focal Soften” options.


Our puppy, getting into some mischief - a bad angle suddenly becomes cool when you add “Holga-ish” and “Focal Zoom”.

Now, here’s the rub. While certain basic editing features of Picnik are free, some of the more advanced options - such as those I’ve used here - aren’t. It’s $25 for a year’s use of Picnik Premium. But hey - compared to Photoshop, that’s a bargain. Oh yeah, and it’s insanely easy to use. Point and click, the whole way through.

Just something to consider, if you’ve got some Cps laying around. Or, you know, a great shot of drunk Prudence that needs sprucing up. :)

22 Responses to “I’m Not a Professional Photographer; I Just Play One on Flickr.”

1.
e says:

Pros pay a LOT of money for actions like those - Kevin Kubota, Totally Rad Actions, Nik filters and lots of others. There, the secret is out

2.
M says:

Very cool effects!

just say no to the hookah pipe though!

3.
Bee Icon
Miss Coconut says:

Wow, I woke up this morning thinking what should I do today? You just solved my dilemma!!!!! ;)

4.
Katharine says:

Those look fantastic! Well done! I want to play around with that now. I still think you need a bit of an artistic eye, though - to envision what you want!

5.
Nstar says:

Love what you did to that Chinatown man picture! It looks so pro!

6.
GetMarried4Less says:

yes…yes…..i will be picking up this feature.

i’d plan to take my Flickr account Pro once i got the wedding pics in…or at least got closer to it (5 mos and counting). this will definitely work for me since i’m getting a digital only package from my photographer.

and i’ll have sooo much time on my hands bc i am moving to a new city and state where the only blessed soul i will know will be my husband…..i’ll have oodles of free time.

7.
hbowar says:

Thank you for posting about this! I was just using it and it’s so easy and fun!

8.
Mrs.MadBrave says:

YOU’RE A GENIUS!!!!!!! I do photoshop and it tends to take my life away. I just put some drama on my Goddaughter’s bapistmal pictures and it brighten up my day. I think the mom of the baby because her pro-photographers flaked.

THANK YOU!

9.
suzanno says:

Very fun! We have the full edition of Photoshop (bought at somewhat of a discount for a class) but it is terribly time consuming to learn, and even at the discount was really expensive. This sounds way easier, and the photos look great!

By the way, I have several friends who are professional photographers, and while things have changed since photoshop they have told me that shooting film they would generally get one “keeper” for about every 10 shots. So around 3 per roll of film. Granted, they are pickier than most of us, but it should make everybody feel better about tossing the shots that just don’t make the grade.

10.
July2008Bride says:

Okay… call me stupid. But do I have to sign up for Flickr Pro to get picnik? I don’t see it on the regular flickr. And it would give me something to do!

I need help! lol

11.
KatyStardust says:

OOH ooh ooh! I’m totally going to try this out! LOVE IT! I didn’t realize there was a lomo-ish filter. Yay!

12.
Bee Icon
Mrs. Lovebug says:

July2008Bride - nope, you don’t have to have Flickr Pro to use the basic Picnik functions. Just follow the links to allow Picnik access to your account.

13.
NearlyMsSubrosa says:

Wow, that’s definitely worth looking into, thanks. Looks a bit more advanced than iPhoto, but easier to use than Photoshop.

14.
tatuan says:

gffg

15.
Mandy says:

Google also offers many of the same options (and more) through their free picture editor, Picasa.

16.
Our First Post-Wedding Wedding » Weddingbee » The Wedding Blog says:

[…] photos were few and rather awful. But Mrs Lovebug’s hot tip has gotten me into Picnik in a big way, so here they are, artsied up in best “memories of […]

17.
pinwheelspoprocks says:

this makes me feel so old but when i was in college (I have a BFA in Photography but did not pursue it as a career - parents love that!) we used to have a joke about crappy images: you can take your CP, slap it on a mat board, or even better, buy (you wouldn’t bother making it) a window cut matte and voila! a professional photo!

while you may not care how “timeless” your wedding images are - personally I think any style, including photojournalism wedding photography (sorry but what a crock! that means “I don’t know how to pose people & I haven’t shot many weddings), in time will feel somewhat dated. Isn’t that half the fun of looking at old photos?
If you are in love with a fish eye lens (be careful how close it gets to your face unless you are getting married in a house of mirrors) and oversaturated colors, well go for it. It’s the packages that really tell you what you need to know about a photographer. If they withhold a DVD or rights to your images, or try to pump up the price with all kinds of albums, they aren’t confident about their work. Sure everyone offers the albums and such, but you shouldn’t have to pay an exorbatent amount of money for a high res jpg on a DVD.
And if you kind of like a photo, use picnik, throw a matte and frame on it, and you’ve got a masterpiece!

18.
Bee Icon
Mrs. Lovebug says:

pinwheels: photojournalism is a crock? LOL. Thanks for your enlightening and meaningful addition to the discussion.

19.
pinwheelspoprocks says:

well let me clarify: of course there’s photojournalism but it’s not a “style” of photography, y’know?

20.
pinwheelspoprocks says:

the crock is that photographers charge more for their photojournalistic style. My point is that you choose someone for their eye - style is subjective and documenting any event, be it a wedding or your husband taking out the trash, can be considered photojournalism.

21.
Bee Icon
Mrs. Lovebug says:

pinwheels: super. thanks for clarifying.


You can also just...

Copyright 2004-2008, eHarmony, Inc.