Newer blog post
more in Blog
Older blog post
Newer blog post by Ms Fondue
more by Ms Fondue (oldest)
Older blog post by Ms Fondue
Ms Fondue's Picture
Miss Fondue, Nashville Age and Occupation: 27, Technical Analyst Fiance's Age and Occupation: 25, Network Admin Student/Senior Game Advisor Engagement Date: December 25, 2007 Wedding Date: May 2009 Blogging Since: September 14, 2008 Venue: Ravenwood Golf Club About Me: I’m your average computer geek marrying a gaming geek and trying to find a good balance of elegance and geek chic in our wedding. I adore The Sims, Nintendo, cosplay, (good) music, TiVo, theme parks, and our two crazy felines.
About Ms Fondue

To Poof or Not to Poof?

November 12th, 2008 @ 12:02 pm by Ms Fondue

Note to Mr. Fondue: Dress pictures ahead! Stay away!

After purchasing my dress, I began thinking of what to wear underneath it. I loved the fullness of Mrs. Shortcake’s gown. I already owned a hoop skirt, but I also purchased a petticoat so I could experiment.

Happily, my dress came in last week. I went and picked it up like a giddy little girl, but didn’t bother to try it on at the store, since I wanted pictures and they don’t allow them. At home, I tried getting into the dress by myself and got stuck. I nearly had to ask for Mr. Fondue’s help to remove it from me. Luckily, I freed myself in time, so I was able to keep the dress a secret. After that fiasco, I hightailed it to my parents’ house to enlist Mama Fondue’s assistance.

I tried the dress three different ways: without anything underneath, with just the petticoat, and with both the hoop and the petticoat. This gave me three different fullness levels that I could present to you, so you all could help me decide what looks best! Mama Fondue was very thorough and took both full-length and close-up shots, so there are a lot of photos to assist you. So, without further ado… (Ignore my lack of make-up and makeshift hairstyle.)

Option #1: Nothing Underneath
The dress has some built-in netting of its own. I tried it on in the store and fell in love with it without having anything underneath, so I wanted to show it to you all without any slips.

Here it is from the front:

To Poof or Not to Poof? :  wedding nashville wedding dress Img 03704

To Poof or Not to Poof? :  wedding nashville wedding dress Img 03705

And from the back:

To Poof or Not to Poof? :  wedding nashville wedding dress Img 03806

To Poof or Not to Poof? :  wedding nashville wedding dress Img 03706

Option #2: Petticoat Alone
This gives a little extra fullness, but boy do my legs feel kind of tangled up in everything when I walk. It will probably be better after the dress is hemmed.

Here it is from the front:

To Poof or Not to Poof? :  wedding nashville wedding dress Img 03707

To Poof or Not to Poof? :  wedding nashville wedding dress Img 03708

And from the back:

To Poof or Not to Poof? :  wedding nashville wedding dress Img 03709

To Poof or Not to Poof? :  wedding nashville wedding dress Img 037010

Option #3: Hoop and Petticoat
This gives the most fullness, with the added bonus of keeping my legs cool and tangle free. The hoop could theoretically be adjusted smaller (I’ve done this before, and it’s kind of a pain, but it IS possible), so I could get it down to the size of option #2, if you guys like that fullness better.

Here it is from the front:

To Poof or Not to Poof? :  wedding nashville wedding dress Img 03601

To Poof or Not to Poof? :  wedding nashville wedding dress Img 03602

And from the back:

To Poof or Not to Poof? :  wedding nashville wedding dress Img 037011

To Poof or Not to Poof? :  wedding nashville wedding dress Img 037012

So, what do you guys think? How full should I go?

Tags: nashville, wedding-dress |
advertisement below
Newer blog post
more in Blog
Older blog post
Newer blog post by Ms Fondue
more by Ms Fondue (oldest)
Older blog post by Ms Fondue

68 Responses to “To Poof or Not to Poof?”

1 2 3 4 

1.
SpaceC06
Member
SpaceC06 (message)  422 posts, Helper bee

I personally like the nothing underneath option. I think it is a gorgeous full dres with out the addition of “obstacles”

 
2.
kara
Member
kara (message)  625 posts, Busy bee

The dress is beautiful! I think I would go with option 2. I’m sure the petticoat is a pain, but I think it gives it just that extra oomph without being too much.

 
3.
Guest Icon
Guest
Karen

Option 2!

 
4.
Guest Icon
Guest
melodicsighs

i agree that the hoop is too much, it seems to take away some of the folds of the pickups, too. i like option number 2, but if it really feels like too much stuff in the way, the dress alone really is lovely.

 
5.
hbowar
Member
hbowar (message)  547 posts, Busy bee

I’m torn between 2 & 3. I do like it plan as well, but think the extra fullness gives the dress a little bit more.

 
6.
Member Icon
Member
WeddingKitty (message)  100 posts, Blushing bee

option 2! it looks much better from the back than option 1!

 
7.
Guest Icon
Guest
buttercup

I like option 2. I went through a similar thing with my dress, and I ended up going with a fullness the same size as your option 2. (Probably why I like that one :) )

 
8.
Member Icon
Member
jenn-dig (message)  47 posts, Newbee

Ooooooh, pretty! I like option 1. It has plenty of “poof” on its own and it *has* to be more comfy than wearing all the stuff underneath. Itchy legs, anyone?

 
9.
Guest Icon
Guest
nashgirl

I definitely think it looks better with some “poof” - I tend toward 3, but 2 is good too!

 
10.
Member Icon
Member
jenn-dig (message)  47 posts, Newbee

Hmmm… looked at it again. I agree with WeddingKitty. Option 2 looks much better from the back than option 1. I withdraw my previous comment.

 
11.
Guest Icon
Guest
Jess

I think #2, with the petticoat. It doesn’t look too much fuller than with nothing under, but it really looks great from behind! With nothing underneath, the back looks kind of deflated.

Also, your dress looks great in white!!

 
12.
Guest Icon
Guest
K

Option 2! The dress really does lay beautifully with just that little addition of fullness. If all the layers really bother you, try adjusting the hoop size like you said and see if that gives you the same effect. By the way, it’s STUNNING!

 
13.
Member Icon
Member
mlglass (message)  24 posts, Newbee

Definitely option 2….Your dress is gorgeous!!!! Although, I might try all three options again once the dress is hemmed. It might look a little different.

 
14.
Member Icon
Member
tater (message)  122 posts, Blushing bee

As I commented in your previous dress post, I wore this dress at my Oct. wedding. I just had a light crinoline underneath and I didn’t have any issues with it getting caught up. I think #2 is the way to go, the pickups do need just that little bit of extra oomph; but the hoop is a bit much. You look great!!

 
15.
Guest Icon
Guest
 
16.
Member Icon
Member
callalillies (message)  107 posts, Blushing bee

#3 totally! it gives life to the skirt! and besides, when else do you get to wear a hoop and a petticoat?

 
17.
Bee Icon
Bee
Miss Taffy (message)  3,104 posts, Sugar bee

I love the hoop!!! The dress looks great so full, and you will be the most comfortable without the petticoat around your legs. If you wear the hoop without the petticoat on top, do the hoops show through?

 
18.
Guest Icon
Guest
linda

you have to have poof! go with #3!

 
19.
Guest Icon
Guest
MrsWright22

Hmmm, I think it looks best with just the petticoat. The hoop seems to take away some of the pick-ups, especially from the front. It looks great all three ways, I just think #2 is best :)

 
20.
Luvbug6315
Member
Luvbug6315 (message)  425 posts, Helper bee

how pretty! You look beautiful. Go with option #2!

 
1 2 3 4 

Leave a Reply


You can also just...

Newer blog post
more in Blog
Older blog post
Newer blog post by Ms Fondue
more by Ms Fondue (oldest)
Older blog post by Ms Fondue

Visit our sister sites eHarmony
Online Dating
eHarmony Advice
Dating Advice
Project Wedding
Wedding Songs
JustMommies
Pregnancy Calendar

Copyright 2004-2012, Weddingbee.com
 

Find your vendors on Weddingbee

Real reviews from brides in your area!

Favors by Weddingbee

  • Favors by season

Shop Now »

Ms Fondue
Ms Fondue

Miss Fondue, Nashville Age and Occupation: 27, Technical Analyst Fiance's Age and Occupation: 25, Network Admin Student/Senior Game Advisor Engagement Date: December 25, 2007 Wedding Date: May 2009 Blogging Since: September 14, 2008 Venue: Ravenwood Golf Club About Me: I’m your average computer geek marrying a gaming geek and trying to find a good balance of elegance and geek chic in our wedding. I adore The Sims, Nintendo, cosplay, (good) music, TiVo, theme parks, and our two crazy felines.

Boards
Classifieds

Blog Calendar
February 2012
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
2930311234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
26272829

Weddingbee Bios
Wiki
More